Random DocumentaryStorm Documentary Top Documentary List
DocumentaryStorm on Twitter  DocumentaryStorm RSS  Subscribe to DocumentaryStorm via E-mail  

Recent Comments
  • From Christian to Atheist by Bruce: You are the authority on what will produce ‘good results’ and what those ‘good results’ look like? Often what happens...
  • From Christian to Atheist by David Broman: Giving shelter to superstitious thinking will not produce good results for our society.
  • Protest Music and the Modern Age by Jamie Kasberg Bright: i believe he’s referring to pop music and shit you see on mtv.. underground is different, there’s a reason...
  • Protest Music and the Modern Age by hem-ir-oid: well it does say in the description “is protest music dead?” thats probably why Boyd made the comment. i mean, i...
  • The Bridge by Revanhavoc: Tragic, really. If you are alone don’t give up. Not yet.
  • North Korean Labor Camps by watcher: Recognizing that a belief affects a personally attributive behavior (relative to human interaction), is as valid as recognizing the...
  • North Korean Labor Camps by watcher: Recognizing that a belief affects a personally attributive behavior (relative to human interaction), is as valid as recognizing the...
  • North Korean Labor Camps by watcher: Recognizing that a belief affects a personally attributive behavior (relative to human interaction), is as valid as recognizing the...
  • From Christian to Atheist by David Broman: And… one more point to prove my previously stated “bubble” theory… Your idea for a segment showing that...
  • From Christian to Atheist by David Broman: Hi… there are some points in your letter that I can use, but think of this: You are floating in a bubble with Hitchens, Dawkins,...
  • From Christian to Atheist by Bruce: I think its the fact that the topic is being addressed at all is the problem. Others have done it and done it quite well, but even then its...
  • From Christian to Atheist by AZryan: “-I have very little knowledge of Judiasm or Islam, and these people make up only 2% of the US population– in contrast to 80%...
  • Into Eternity


    Into Eternity

    Illuminated only by the burning match he holds in his fingers, a man speaks directly to the camera. But he’s not talking to you. He’s addressing people of the future, perhaps 100,000 years from now. “We have buried something from you,” he says, “to protect you.”

    The man is Michael Madsen, a Danish filmmaker and artist. The location is a tunnel, under construction deep in Finnish bedrock. And the something that will be buried — that event, too, is in the future — is radioactive waste.

    Into Eternity is a documentary about a massive crypt called Onkalo (Finnish for “hiding place”), the world’s first permanent underground vault for nuclear detritus. The movie considers the practical problems of burying the deadly stuff so effectively that it won’t be disturbed during the hundreds of centuries necessary for it to decay. But because the time frame is so long — far longer than recorded human history — these problems become philosophical, even mystical.

    Released 6 Jan. 2010. Directed by Michael Madsen. Documentary film.

    Into Eternity, 5.0 out of 6 based on 2 ratings
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    Share This Documentary

    Similar Documentaries

    Discuss This Documentary

    • Stephanie

      Too bad the video has been removed from YouTube. I guess the owners of the film need to collect more copyright money. I understand this on the one hand, but on the other, it’s such an important story for people to hear about and understand, one of the most important humankind faces currently.

      • http://www.documentarystorm.com Jonas

        Hi,

        the film is up again, thanks.

    • Cam

      “Once upon a time, man learned to master fire; something no living creature had done before him. Man conquered the entire world. One day, he found a new fire. A fire so powerful, that it could never be extinguished. Man reveled in the thought that he now possessed the powers of the universe. Then in horror, he realized that his new fire could not only create, but also destroy. Not only could it burn on land, but inside all living creatures; inside his children, the animals, all crops. Man looked around for help, but found none. And so he built a burial chamber, deep in the bowels of the Earth; a hiding place, for the fire to burn, into eternity.”

      That was my favorite part; I love that little monologue! Never have I heard such poetic words about a topic so scientific as nuclear energy…

    • Cam

      @ Eric; oh, but I did forget to mention that the one part I really thought was weird and didn’t understand was that one shot of the Moose taking a shit in the snow…that was pretty bizarre I certainly admit

      • Eric

        Haha that was really funny and random, when the moose shat, at least I woke up for a second, if only the rest of the doc was that engaging. I thought the film was of a high quality in terms of production (forgive me if my terminology is off), but the ” style” of the film is what I did not enjoy, everything seemed so bland and slow paced.

        The parts where he’s speaking in the dark with a match just sort of reminded me of a Disney film or something, maybe that’s what I was mainly referring to when I said childish, that and how he kept talking to the people of the future, in a fairy tale kind of way, it just seemed to take away from the doc a little in my opinion.

        I think what I’m really trying to get at, when I really think about it, is that this felt more like a movie than a documentary.

        To each his own, I respect your opinion.

    • Cam

      @ Eric, I can appreciate that, even though just about everything you disliked about this documentary are the same things that I thought made it so great. I love that slow-mo, highly detailed/technical style. The only thing I really strongly disagree with is that it was childish/like a kid’s movie. I would think kids’ movies would NOT use such slow-motion, and other such effects. In fact, I think it seemed very mature and adult-oriented. It certainly is an adult topic, to say the least, but I’m speaking about the style in which it was filmed, rather than the topic. I just find nuclear reactors/nuclear technology soooo interesting. I’m not calling you simple-minded or anything to that effect, but I definitely give it 10/10. I’m just surprised the word “childish” came to your mind…quite the opposite was my reaction

    • Eric

      This one’s sort of strange, I didn’t really enjoy any of this doc, I can’t even really explain why. The subject matter was interesting, it was just the “feel” of this doc, I don’t really know how to put it.

      At no point was I ever fully engaged or interested, and it almost felt immature and childish the whole way through too, like a kids movie or something, I dunno just very strange. All in all, I’d honestly rate this doc 5/10, it was just sooooo boring.

      Now I’m just waiting for someone to reply that I’m simple minded or something to that effect, but I really just found this doc to be extremely bland, with the semi slow-mo shots of the workers and everything, just ughhh.

    • Dee Zsombor

      The reason why spent fuel pools need cooling is that we only burn up less than 3% of the uranium. We could use the rest as well, the technology for doing so exists and have been proven to work in numerous cases, with some countries like France operating one time reuse programs.

      It is possible and this was demonstrated to produce waste that needs only 300 years safe storage as opposed to 100 000. However during most reprocessing cycles plutonium is created and it freaks most people out due to proliferation concerns.

      Proliferation is a great concern, but arguably we are making too much of it. The number of nuclear weapons and weapons grade material have decreased in the last 20 years significantly. Don’t want to downplay this I’m still baffled by the existence of more weaponry than necessary to destroy this planet multiple times. However the fact is that US gets 10% of its electricity by burning material from dismantled nuclear bombs from ex soviet countries. As of 2010 material equivalent to 16,000 nuclear warheads has been reused as electricity. Google Megatons for Megawatts, if it does not put a smile on your face then nothing will.

      If we can dismantle weapons for fuel, by the same extension it is obvious that we can reuse any plutonium created by commercial plants if we go down the reprocessing route. Plus the plutonium produce this way is not weapons grade, to make it so would require far more work a rouge state would not have to build a commercial powerplant with a commercial reprocessing just to get the weapons grade plutonium, they could do the same by using cheaper throw away installations.

      The fact is that if we want to preserve human development we need widely deployable and *stable* energy source. The so called renewable are intermittent and usable only in fringe cases. I find it enraging that when asked if solar & wind can fit the bill most apologists go back into explaining how perhaps it could if we would trow more money at it.

      Even more enraging is when they expect so much about efficiency improvements without acknowledging that the bulk of the planet lives in a poverty. Any efficiency improvement in the developed world would be massively offset by the simple movement of the developing word to a the same standard. Assuming they go to the same standard instead of a more wasteful phase the industrialized world had gone trough already. A poor family in India will have infinitely lower CO2 emissions and environmental footprint than the most efficient family out of all industrial nations. Failure to see things in a global perspective makes most greens today black as fossil fuels.

      Secondly all those wind turbines need Rare Earth materials that for are not exactly commodities. Their use should warrant more than a dumb 1.2 MW windturbine with 20-30% usage grade. This difference between the so called “installed capacity” and the actual electricity produced due to intermittent nature of the power source is often ignored. For example Germany a leader in wind power deployment is said to have 20% renewable portfolio. In fact this is merely the installed capacity, the average german uses only 6% of electricity from renewables. The rest is coal. Greenpeace should call itself BlackPeace.

    • Hib

      Take a look at “the nuclear comeback” doc. Seems there are more “onkalos” under construction in sweden and lower level nuclear disposal facilities under the sea.

      I’m all aghast at us humans using this technology after what I’ve learned. I know the risk is small for nuclear disasters, but Murphys law will dominate us all…

    • OneStone

      Really good stuff right here. The whole ideal of nuclear power is a short term solution, but might be a must once the oil runs out. Cheap, clean energy, yet so disturbingly destructive. You hear of a lot of people objecting towards it, but still taking the energy nuclear power creates. Hm.

      I just hope those people in Japan won’t suffer to the Fukushima disaster, they already admitted how they were wrong in the measurement of how much radioactivity came out of the damaged reactor and water. How much does the Japanese government even tell them?

    • Cam

      Also, it’s no secret; who hasn’t heard of nuclear waste?

    • Cam

      Indeed, one of the best documentaries I have ever seen. The issue of depleted uranium is certainly a pressing one…as somebody who very much supports nuclear energy, I feel some sense of responsibility as to dealing with this problem. One of the things I haven’t quite understood is this; they keep in in water pools because the fuel rods get very hot as they decay, and the water keeps them cool. However, this heat causes the water to evaporate, creating the need to continuously pump out steam, and pump in water. Damage to these pumps is what causes the problems at the Fukushima nuclear power station in Sendai, Japan…not the reactor itself, but the depleted uranium water pumps, were what got damaged. I actually found it quite eerie when they showed the scenes of an earthquake somewhere in a marketplace with Asian people running for cover…it made me double check the release date of this film! Anyway, what I was saying is I have never quite understood; if these deleted fuel rods still produce enough heat to evaporate water, why, then is it depleted at all? Couldn’t it still be used to produce energy?

      I have yet to receive a satisfying answer to that question. Obviously, the older it is, the less hot it gets, hence the less energy it can produce; perhaps this small amount of energy is simply not enough to warrant the operation of an entire power plant; perhaps it is not enough energy to service the same communities which the plants service. In any case, I figure that the spent fuel rods may still have some use, but if we really do NEED to get rid of them/do something about them, a facility like Onkalo seems to be the best solution. Although certainly not a perfect solution, it seems the best solution we have…I only hope that they figure out nuclear fusion in the next few decades so we won’t have the need to be using uranium at all anymore.

    • Rabbit from Space

      Now that was just awesome documentary filmmaking! Well done Michael Madsen, I particularly enjoyed the images and sounds deep beneath the crushing earth, within the “secret” that is so destructive. It is a secret which effectively is a child born out of chaos and destruction which will last 100.000 years!

      Humanity is a virus, consuming the world and leaving waste everywhere. Scary stuff!