JFK to 911: Everything is a Rich Man’s Trick

208 minutes 8.9/10 based on 66 votes

Immediately after the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy on November 22, 1963, the United States government came to the conclusion that a lone gun man, a former U.S. Marine by the name of Lee Harvey Oswald had changed the course of history by ending the life of the most powerful man in the world. He did it working by himself with three rifle shots fired from the window of an office building. They have stuck rigidly to this explanation while critics, scientist, playwrights and poets have produced books, essays and even films to prove that this version of history defies the laws of physics and common sense.

Most thinking individuals take a look at history and are forced to ask why the government came up with such a lame scenario to account for what had really happened? Also, why did they stubbornly stick to that improbable story for such along time? And why did so many reputable news sources support them in this lie? Is it possible that they were trying to protect someone?

A group of twenty men met the night before the assassination at the home of Dallas oil millionaire Clint Murchison. Who were these men and what could have possibly brought them together to orchestrate such a cold-blooded murder? What did they stand to lose if JFK continued his government plan? And how can it be that these men and what they stood for continue to influence our lives to this very day?

This film is a lesson in history like most people have never heard before. It takes you all the way back to World War I to the moment when industrialists realized that war was good for business and that as long as there was an enemy, people would willingly finance armed forces.

That was not the only lesson the ruling class learned during this time. The system known as ‘Divide and Rule’ invented by the Romans is still being enforced today because the moment the world becomes at peace, thousands of businesses will go bankrupt. Be prepared to take a good look at terrorism and what it really is all about as you watch this film now.

Rate
GD Star Rating
loading...
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Discuss This Documentary

  • Bull Coon

    This is a must see.. Everyone should have to watch this. It might help motivate people to start getting involved. If we don’t use our voice in mass the rich will just continue to buy anything and anyone they want that will enhance their power and reduce ours.

    • crossseyedlemon

      Actually non involvement is the key. The blueprint to taking down a system is the one the Russian people used to rid themselves of communism. They knew from early on that communism was a sham but they played along with the lie. Not believing in the lie they naturally contributed as little as possible to sustain the system. They knew that absolute power corrupts absolutely and they were proven right as in less than 80 years the communist system collapsed.

  • It’s already been proven that a secret service agent , George HIckey shot Kennedy by accident…and that was covered up! He heard a shot, got his rifle out and he shot Kennedy when his car was jerked forward.

  • Wow, this is a true eye-opener for all Americans to watch!

  • Galactic Wanderer

    This doc is stunning! I watched it for two days, stopping and thinking. I’ve seen quite a lot about the subjects touched there before, but this concise (though running three and a half hours!) compilation is just terrific. Praise the author! It’s all true – I believe in that deeply. “I don’t see we have any option, frank” friends, but the revolution! Thanks to Internet and such films we can do something to get rid of this slavery imposed on us all by these evil forces.

    • crossseyedlemon

      Apparently you missed the part about drinking the kool-aid. Entertaining doc for sure but claiming it’s gospel is absurd. Revolution as a solution is ridiculous since history shows that the end result is always the same….one group of evil exploiters being replaced by a new regime of evil exploiters.

      • alsviews

        Revolution muy bad.

  • Mugsey

    Interesting film. As with all conspiracy theories, it all seems very plausible. I suppose the really scary thing is that you couldn’t rule any of this out.

    • alsviews

      No, I guess you can’t rule it out which terrifies me by the notion that I have lived 70 years in a fantasy.

      • and what is being contemplated next. The current system cannot survive for a whole multitude of reasons, the most pressing perhaps being technological unemployment. Things are gonna get very ugly before, or even if, they get better.

  • disqus_HpgPrOEJLX

    Most of this info was review. Definitely does a more thorough job of connecting it all together while specifying names of people involved.

    Still seems like useless info- i mean really contradicts the whole premise that “knowledge is power”. Knowledge like this only makes me feel helpless.

    • crossseyedlemon

      The author of the doc would tell you that the concept “knowledge is power” is another rich man’s trick and he would be right. Mao got it right when he said true power comes from the barrel of a gun or words to that effect.

  • rickokona

    As a passionate advocate of critical thinking, I watched this film with a “so me the data requirement”. In science there is no thing called proof. Yet as someone trained in pathology, the data provided is very plausible and convincing. No doubt the monied spin doctors have an answer to every issue raised in the film. The fact that they have counter them all for over 50 years is even more compelling, We have been bought sold and delivered. We critical thinkers need to push back with all our might. Yet I fear such a push will be met with extreme violence in the name of anti terror and national security. Maybe the USSR lost the arms race yet pushed the US into a draconian control state and in so doing did not lose after all. No wonder Putin is always grinning

    • MA

      rickokona how bout some critical proof reading. But good points to ponder otherwise.

  • crossseyedlemon

    I thought this was an interesting and well presented doc. I was somewhat surprised that near the end the author advocated revolution as a solution to the Illuminati. Every historian knows that all successful revolutions only succeed in supplanting one group of robber bearers with another. The author also did some speculating on the future agenda of the Illuminati. A fake nuclear war seems like a stretch to me and rather than follow the fascists of Germany and try to exterminate the ill and feeble I think the opposite would make more economic sense for the Illuminati….that is extend the life span of people but keep them dependent of health care for the majority of their lives. No mention was made of climate control or genetic engineering which I think will certainly be high priorities for the Illuminati in the future. Eventually the Illuminati will author its own destruction since a fire that consumes everything in it’s path must eventually consume itself.

  • crossseyedlemon

    The author of the doc states that the assassination conspirators met to devise a fail proof plan but the plan they decided on was anything but. It was incredibly good luck to have a JFK clone on the Dallas police force but what was the conspiracy plan if Tippett somehow survived a murder attempt? The Dealy Plaza shootout was nearly botched completely according to the author so what was the plan had the fatal head shot missed? Why were some of the conspirators liquidated after the big event while others were not? Wouldn’t it be more prudent to eliminate all the loose ends?

  • stevemeikle

    For a start the documentary simply equated mega rich bankers of the19th century with the Illuminati without offering any shred of justification. This is simply lazy and shows a lack of integrity by the film makers. Also, as for the British Royal family, every one knew that the Royal House was of German origin, but to assert that therefore it was not descended from ancient kings of England is even more contemptible. George I was the Elector of Hannover, a German princeling. His grandmother was Elizabeth, daughter of James I of England who himself was great grandson of Henry VII of England, father of one of the pictured and presumably archetypical kings of England asserted as being of no relation to the later Royal family, namely Henry VIII. George of Hannover was chosen in 1714 as he was the closest relative of the House of Stuart who was not a catholic
    If you want to present a conspiracy theory you are to do it properly or make total fools of yourselves.
    You do this by knowing of what you speak and offering proper justification for that you speak of.
    This video is nonsense, but if true you have merely discredited it in the eyes of someone who has a better regard for history than you do, namely myself.
    For shame. For all I know JFK was murdered by a angry husband father or brother of any one of the women that sex maniac could not keep his hands off. You have discredited yourself in trying to argue to the contrary

    • Aloisia Fenyes

      No!! not everyone knows about the Royal family being Germanic especially swarms of monarchists and the ignorant, who live in fairy land re: the Queen and most world matters. My personal friends have owned castles and still do in Germany since 1200s they are related to Mary Queen of Scots. A small few rule the world, and always have, and it is only when the mob revolt like the French Revolution and the Russian movement seeing to the execution of Tzar Nicholas that we see dramatic change. Globalization and discontent with the red carpet elite is becoming more obscene, more provocative and there is eventually bound to be a revolution on a global scale against a system of obscene greed and rife corruption. I met the Queen personally in Sydney at a Journalistic function, she is a human just like everyone… she eats, sleeps, and defecates! however England’s wealth, famous Art works artifacts etc the Spinx stolen beard still sits in the British Museum, all this and more, especially the Monarchy’s wealth appropriated from all over the world due to colonization …these criminal based fat cats are sitting on a pile of stolen.

      • RB Glennie

        Yes, the Russian and French revolutions, that’s what we should aspire for, another Reign of Terror and yet another much more long-lived reign of terror, followed by dictatorial strongman rule in both cases which killed millions.

  • Mick Scott

    Without Doubt,
    1 Of the BEST Documentaries I have ever seen.

    Should be watched by EVERYBODY !

  • TruthHurts2013

    This documentary is ‘Obvious’. Anyone with half a brain and one eye can see this is how the world works. However the presenters blatant anti-monarchist and pro-communist/socialist bias completely discredits this documentary. Shame. The Monarchs of Britain have all been born in England since George III. Can anyone else trace their family tree back to the 1700’s? I consider myself English and can’t trace my family tree back to the first member in my family to be born and raised as English. In any case the Royal family doesn’t have a surname and never have. They choose it whenever they want. It’s either a nickname or a place name. It is an interesting documentary but completely tainted by the presenter’s personal communist views.

  • k

    I would like to think that he has truth in here but some of the huge sweeping statements worry me like the supposed fact that german jeeps were made by ford and the actualy railway made for the camps was actually supplied by materials wise via u.s money men . The JFK thing again sweeping statement that their was 8 hit men ..and says its a fact ..how is it a fact he offeres no actual evidence to back it up but comes out with it as such the name of them and how much they got paid . Who gave him this info / fact then the supposed actor clip for 911 straigh out claiming the black guy in the suit was a handler to ensure he said what was required and presents it as fact . Sadly it taints a great documenmtary that could have being mindblowing with alot less supposed fats with no back up and more actual facts backed up .

  • Christian Champagne

    Crazy doc, but in a good, interesting way! I think initially the reaction is that..this can’t be! But a lot of the theories i think are totally possible.

  • HiJanx

    After watching this, my conclusion is that all of the people commenting below , are government plants praising a terrible “documentary.” Anyone with a brain can easily see how fragmented & absurd this movie actually is. Within the first 10 minutes or so, the documentary attempts to brainwash the viewers; ” There were actually 8 snipers but we’re only showing you 6 snipers because the other 2…. (A bunch of irrelevant info is then added by the “historian” who directed the documentary which, subsequently, distracts the viewer to not be concerned about the other 2 snipers. The question about where the 2 other snipers were & how they played into the JFK assassination is never answered.) ” Even before I started watching the film I became suspicious of the whole thing thanks to the directors name: Francis Richard Conolly. The name is very similar to Francis Ford Coppola who is an icon in Hollywood. Coincidence? I think not. The fact of the matter is all the nice historical film provided in the documentary really does nothing except to , again, distract the viewer from what is actually being said in the documentary. Right at the beginning of the film, there is a statement that is printed saying something like ” This documentary contains many distressing images. Watch it anyway.” So, the viewer is set up from there on out; “the pix are disturbing but , you know, WATCH IT ANYWAY.” = “the images in this film are provided to distract the viewer from really listening to the dialogue, which is intentional because this film is a giant distortion of the truth.”

  • Sharie Angel Roses

    Matthew 24

  • Michael Styles

    My take on any thing of this nature, is this; if this documentary is only 50% factual.then a horrible thing has

    been revealed. If it’s only 25% factual, still pretty bad. When I finished watching it, my first thought was; “how
    could this video ever make it into the public eye?” Wouldn’t these criminals want this video buried? OR, are
    the perpetraitors so arrogant as to believe they are untouchable? I believe They are. Just look at cheney,

    rumsfeld, wolfiwitz, ashcroft, and bush jr. After President Obama was inaugurated, he immediately announced
    that he wouldn’t go after the previous administration for war crimes(iraq), because he wanted America to
    move forward. We lost much more than a great President on 11/22/63, we lost our Democracy. 9/11 only solidified that take over.

  • RB Glennie

    Hard to believe that anyone entertains JFK conspiracy fables at this late date: they all defy the laws of physics as well as common sense

Like Us on Facebook?

Never miss out on free documentaries by liking us on Facebook.